Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: kenlong@netcom.com (Ken Long)
Subject: Re: What are Ken Johnson's wins?
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 1995 15:29:08 GMT

Why am I here?

(1) Because it's my "only terminal" since the Church won't "listen" or 
act on standard ethics, tech and/or admin.

(2) Because some reader might recommend a course of action to actually get 
my situation resolved, since standard lines don't work.

(3) Because, contrary to popular belief, I don't have 1,000,000,000 years 
to get it resolved, from my viewpoint.  LRH said service must be as close 
to instant as possible, otherwise it's an enemy to the service provider.

(4) Because it's the truth, standing in the light of day, for all to see, 
whereas the Scn. public thinks those products I created are owned by the 
Church and were gotten through honorable means "because they are there" 
and "because it's Flag, and are thus operating on a lie.

(5) Because I think the Church is not being run on standard ethics tech 
and admin (as indicated by it's treatment of me and others) and I want 
that corrected.  LRH says one must notify the IJC by whatever comm-line 
(even though the IJC in this case is one of the "shoddy substitutes" for 
a Scientologist).  Which ever true Scientologist will replace the current 
IJC will get the word, eventually.  LRH also says that if it's all 
rotten, and NO avenue of approach is successful in KSW, then 
Scientologist MUST still keep Scientology working - even if it's forced 
from outside the org.

Scientology does not belong to any "organization" - it belongs to those 
individuals who are able to use it for the Aims of Scientology.

The subject was available to ANYONE in the Free Zone, until the Church, 
out of the Free Zone, was formed to ensure those who were able to avail 
themselves of Scientology were successful in doing so.  Now it's acting 
as a barrier to ANYONE, and the Church IS (as repeatedly demonstrated by 
their actions) doing things contrary to the Aims of Scientology.

The high crimes of blocking staff or public from moving up the Bridge, 
breech of ecclesiastical duty, waste of org personnel and material, 
causing disrepute, etc. are rampant within it.

I'm applying ethics gradients by mentioning the out-ethics situation to 
others.  But there is no response STILL toward *their* putting their 
ethics in.  Is it time to increase the gradient?

-Ken-