======== Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Erlich - still at large! From: inForm@primenet.com (Rev. Dennis L Erlich) Date: 24 Jan 1997 18:28:06 -0700 Faithful Reader, After 30 minutes of lies and vile accuasation against YNH from the scieno-paid slime lawyer for my venomous ex-wife, Rosa, attempting to blow smoke at the the court about how bad I was, the judge dismissed the charges and denied to motion to throw me in jail for 40 days for failing to abide by court orders. He said that I had made all my required child support payments in a timely manner and that there was no cause whatsoever for the action the lawyer requested. Slimeberg, the scieno-paid attorney, asked the judge if the ruling was "with prejudice" (meaning can he present the same charges again) and the judge said no. So this little episode of harassment is over. Appeal of the contempt ruling is going forward and we should have a ruling within a couple of weeks. The scienos are no doubt wailing an gnashing their teeth as I write this. :) Thanks to all who assisted in my defense. I couldn't have made it without your kind thoughts and at times, tangible support. Bless you. Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * * ======== Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Re: Erlich - still at large! From: inForm@primenet.com (Rev. Dennis L Erlich) Date: 24 Jan 1997 20:24:08 -0700 inForm@primenet.com (Rev. Dennis L Erlich): >Slimeberg, the scieno-paid attorney, asked the judge if the ruling was >"with prejudice" (meaning can he present the same charges again) and >the judge said no. Rather the judge said "yes". The ruling is 'with prejudice', meaning it cannot be relitigated. A done deal. Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * *